ON VIDEO WENDY MONTAGU AUGUST 2006, WAS KICKED OUT OF LAS VEGAS RIO CASINO FOR LIFE! WITNESSES STATED THEY SAW WENDY DRUNK RUNNING NAKED SCREAMING IN THE HALLWAY, SECURITY WAS CALLED WENDY BUFORD MONTAGU PUNCHED THE SECURITY GUARD. WENDY MONTAGU LEFT HER DAUGHTER IN THE POOL ALL DAY ALONE NO ONE COULD FIND HER SIX YEAR OLD DAUGHTER. LETTERS WERE WRITTEN TO CPS AND THE JUDGE WENDY WAS ORDERED TO LEAVE LAS VEGAS AT 3 am IN THE MORNING WENDY MONTAGU HAD TO LEAVE NEVER TO RETURN TO LAS VEGAS AGAIN.

WENDY MONTAGU PUNCHED THE BARTENDER AT THE HARRODS RIO HOTELS FOR LIFE. WENDY MONTAGU WAS ANGRY AGAIN AT A BARTENDER FOR CUTTING MS. WENDY MONTAGU OFF AT THE POOL BAR.  WENDY MONTAGU RAN LEAVING HER YOUNG DAUGHTER WITH STRANGERS AT THE POOL AREA.
SECURITY LOOKED FRANTICLY FOR THE CHILD WAS FINALLY FOUND HOURS LATER. THE DUKE AND WENDY MONTAGU WERE SEPARATED IN 2005, 2006 AND JUST TOOK A SIDE VACATION WITH FRIENDS HE THOUGHT THE KIDS MIGHT ENJOY SEEING  THERE MOTHER.
 THE CHILDREN WERE DISGUSTED AND ALSO WERE FORCED TO LEAVE AT 3am TRYING TO CATCH THE EARLIEST FLIGHT OUT OF LAS VEGAS.  WENDY MONTAGU NOT ALLOWED BACK EVER!  MANY LETTERS WERE WRITTEN TO THE JUDGE INTHE DIVORCE   CASE  WENDY MONTAGU WAS A MENACE TO THE NEIGHBORS AND CONSTANTLY DRUNK AND VIOLENT. THAT ISCWHY THE JUDGE ORDERED WENDY MONTAGU AWAY FROM HER CHILDREN AND GRANTED  THE DUKE A STAY AWAY ORDER. THE CHILDREN WERE FINALLY SAFE.

WENDY BUFORD MONTAGU, Who never paid ONE BILL 15 YEARS OF MARRIAGE, The 13th Dukes X wife who lost her children because she was a Drunk and doctors and a Judge saw fit that WENDY BUFORD WAS A DANGER TO HER CHILDREN AS STATED BY HER OWN CHILDREN. WENDY BUFORD MONTAGU THEN TELLS ONE SIDED STORYS TO THE MEDIA AND ANYONE WHO WILL LISTEN. READ BELOW HOW WENDY MONTAGU'S CHILDREN WERE IN FEAR OF BEING ALONE WITH HER BECAUSE OF HER DRINKING AND ANGER , AND VOLATILITY WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD WAS ORDERED BY THE GOOD JUDGE AWAY FROM HER HOME AND CHILDREN. MANY LETTERS WRITTEN AGAINST WENDY MONTAGU PEOPLE WERE AFRAID FOR THE CHILDREN.

WENDY BUFORDS PAYMENTS FROM HER HUSBANDS TRUST WERE NEVER STOPPPED AS WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD LIED TO THE MEDIA AND HER CHILDREN. Wendy BUFORD Montagu AS OF TODAY IS STILL USEING HER DUKE OF MANCHESTERS TAX ID IN THE UK. SHES NOT MARRIED NEVER WAS AND SHES PAYING HER TAXES UNDER HIS NAME HOW SICK CAN YOU GET KEEP IT UP WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD. WHY ARE YOU STILL USEING YOUR X HUSBANDS GOOD NAME. LIKE MELINDA PILLSBURY FOSTER OUR MOTHER USES THE GOOD PILLSBURY NAME KNOWING MY GRANDPARENTS THOUGHT SHE WAS MENTALLY ILL. GO BACK TO BUFORD WHERE YOU BELONG. QUIT PAYING YOUR UK TAXES UNDER THE DUKES NAME. BUFORD IS YOUR MADIEN NAME ITS EASY TO CHANGE.

 WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD REFUSED TO DOCUMENT HER PAYMENTS FROM THE DUKES TRUST TO DSS CHILD SERVICES. THEY CANCELED HER FOR NON COOPERATION.

WENDY BUFORD MONTAGU WAS ORDERED AWAY FROM HER CHILDREN AND HOME

BY THE ORANGE COUNTY COURT. HER CHILDREN WERE AFRAID OF HER AGRESSIVE DRUNK BEHAVIOR. NEIGHBORS AND FRIENDS ALSO WROTE LETTERS ABOUT WENDY MONTAGUS AGRESSIVE ANGRY BEHAVIOR. SHE NEVER PAID ANY HOUSEHOLD BILLS OR WAS HOME MOST IF THE TIME. THE COURTS RECORDS STATED THE DUKE RAISED THE CHILDREN. WENDY BUFORD STATED SHE DID NOT RAISE THE CHILDREN

SHE WAS WORKING.  WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD KEPT HER MONEY NO ONE KNOWS WHAT SHE DID WITH HER MONEY.  WENDY NEVER PAID ANY BILLS IN 15 YEARS OF MARRIAGE.

MY MOTHER THE MELINDA PILLSBURY FOSTER IS HOMELESS AGAIN WITH MY BROTHER AURTHUR. THANK GOD FOR RAYLAN AT RUMOR MILL NEWS FINDING OUT MELINDA PILLSBURY FOSTER IS INSANE. ITS STILL SO SAD SHES MENTALLY UNSTABLE PEOPLE! MELINDA PILLSBURY FOSTER NEEDS HELP. SHE NEEDS A HOSPITOL. BELOW IS YET ANOTHER RANT FROM THE MELINDA THERE ARE SO MANY SHES NOT TO BE TRUSTED. MELINDA YOU HAVE BEEN DOUBBLE DIPPING INTO THE GOVERMENTS POCKET AND YOUR NOT SUPPOSE TO BE WORKING ANYWAY. RE?MEMBER YOUR BLIND AND DISABLED AS YOU DO STALKING WEBSITES AND TELL PEOPLE LIES ABOUT YOUR EDUCATION AND YOU NO JOURNALISM DEGREE. GO GET A REAL PAYING JOB QUIT LIVING OFF THE GOVERMENT AND OUR BROTHER AURTHUR FOSTERS STATE CHECK!

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Rayelan Allan AKA Raye Smith

RESPONSE

August 16, 2013

To: Raye Smith 
Subject Property Address: 525 Bunker Hill Road, Ashtabula Ohio 44004

Regarding: Resolution of immediate issues to avoid litigation



Dear Ms. Smith:


You served me on Monday with a writing which purports to be a "Notice to Quit" or "Notice of Eviction." which you imply is governed by Ohio Revised Code Section 5321.15, and Chapter 5321 general, 5321.01 and all following sections.

This is not a tenancy issue but one of employment, which will be brought to the attention of the requisite legal authorities for reasons detailed below.

In September, 2011 I began working for you as director of advertising for Rumor Mill News. In reliance on your promises and representations I relocated to Ohio. In addition, you asked me to assist you in other multiple ways. You had persuaded me to relocate from California offering, as a benefit of employment, the housing I still occupy along with other benefits. These facts are demonstrable and continuous for nearly two years. From 2011 until today, August 2013, you have never voiced a single complaint about my work.

Your present actions are an attempt to evade the legal ramifications of this employment contract. The violations you have committed are both specific to the state of Ohio and also federal.

After consultation with my own legal counsel, and requiring him and his law clerk to review the situation, the following response is provided to you for immediate action.


(1) You have never complied with your obligations as a Landlord under Ohio Revised Code Section 5321.04.

(2) You have engaged in illegally abusive conduct against two disabled people whom you invited into your house as an employer and CEO of Rumor Mill News. I was offered benefits as compensation in exchange for services. Your actions are in violation of Ohio Revised Code Sections 5123.01, 5123.50, 5123.61, and 5123.621.

(3) You are not lawfully my "landlord," in any sense nor Arthur's, under Ohio law (compare Ohio 12th District Court of Appeals, Ebbing v. Lawhorn, July 16, 2012) because my agreement was to come to work with

Rumor Mill News as a legal entity or corporate employee. You offered many inducements to me. I was reluctant to cross not only six state lines but three time zones, with my disabled son.

The provision of three rooms in your house, was one of the multiple benefits of employment which you laid out for me as compensations.

(5) You cannot evict me without terminating my employment. Once you terminate my employment you become immediately liable for all the false, fraudulent, and illusory promises which you made to me as part of a offer of your offer of employment made as owner of Rumor Mill News. Upon our contract, I have performed all my obligations fully and faithfully up until the present date, but upon that same contract you have failed to perform fully, or faithfully.

You have left me and Arthur very lacking in the bare necessities of life which you had promised expressly, such as health insurance. You will find yourself legally bound and utterly equitably estopped from denying your contract with me, even though it was mostly an oral agreement between us.

(6) You were well aware I was disabled, dependent upon California and Social Security Disability Supplemental Income, and that I was my disabled son's sole caretaker.

(7) Under both Ohio and Federal Law, you, as an employer who invited and induced us to travel across the continent to accept your employment offer, of which your hospitality was an integral, but not exclusive, element, owe a special duty of care when employing a disabled person. I am also accorded additional rights because of my age.

(8) By taking advantage of a disabled person's needs and services, which for a long time I willingly rendered to you in the expectation of the ultimate fulfillment of your promises, you have violated the Americans with Disabilities Act 42 U.S.C. Sections 12101, 12102, and all which follow. I can only suggest that you take these issues up with a qualified Ohio attorney who is qualified to litigate in federal court.

Beginning a month ago, and more immediately on August 14, 2013, you committed the following illegal acts to force me out of the subject property as part of a strategy intended to evade your multiple liabilities:

1) You have harassed me and my disabled son with verbal abuse.

2) Slandered me to others

3) Numerous interruptions and interference with the use of facilities including but not limited to the repairs in the bathroom immediately adjacent to our bedrooms with lengthy work which was carried out during non-business hours into late evening(s).

4) Disconnected me from the utilities of Internet and Vonage phone service which need to be available in order to perform my work related activities.

All of these specific acts speak to a plan which has reduced my income and left me more vulnerable to your continued manipulations.

The most recent of these is your use of a form of "self-help evictions" which is illegal and proscribed under Ohio law, as contained in Ohio Revised Code Section 5321.15.


THERE ARE NO SELF HELP EVICTIONS IN OHIO

In addition, retaliatory eviction is noted and dealt with under Ohio law as well. (ORC section 5321.15)

Undertaking these acts puts you in violation of the law in multiple instances in addition to the more serious charges to which you have laid yourself open by attempting to recharacterize the present situation.

Your actions have already necessitated multiple consultations with my attorney to ascertain the facts in the matter. These fees are being compiled for the record in future court ordered judgments.

Your actions violate Ohio’s landlord/tenant law and may also make you liable to me for actual damages, as well as attorney fees, this separate and distinct from a federal action.

Your continuous interferences have damaged me materially and cost both me and MacPherson Investment Group substantially at a time critical to the launch of our initial introduction of technologies for our clients into Ohio. A denial of access to communications has caused immediate harm which may result in long term impact on our ability to do business, another issue which must be resolved.

I demand that you cease your illegal activity within three (3) hours of receiving this letter - and restore my communications access within this time period and, if you are going to terminate me, provide a severance package. This to be negotiated, as specified below.

I suggest you consult with your attorney, who can confirm the above statements of law.

If we are unable to handle a resolution expeditiously, I will have no other alternative but to retain counsel, and contact the appropriate authorities and persons to assist me.

We are offering you mediation as an avenue for handling further negotiations for final resolution once your illegal activities have ended and my utilities are restored. Ms. Bloom's e-mail is below and she is well aware you may be in touch with her.

It would be best if you emailed and set a time for your discussion in advance.



Sincerely,


_______________________
Melinda Pillsbury-Foster




Ms. Dara Leigh Bloom, Esquire
310-978-7638
dlb2670@gmail.com